This list covers western Hunnic armies from their emergence from the steppes and contact with the Alans in 374 until the last remnants were absorbed by the Avars. The list also covers the (possibly unrelated) Chionites and Hephthalites or “White Huns” and the Sabir; the Chionites from their first intervention in Kushan Bactria in 356 until their destruction by the Sassanids in 468; the Hephthalites until their western part’s amalgamation with remnants of the Juan-juan to form the Avars after 558 and the loss of the eastern part’s Indian empire around 570; and the Sabir from their arrival in the steppes north of the Caucasus around 515 until they were absorbed into the Volga Bulgar confederacy in 558. Contemporaries stress the Huns’ savagery and barbarism “even compared to their neighbours”, that “while other peoples were carried on horseback, the Huns lived there”, their expertise with exceptionally powerful bows and their total confidence. Huns are initially described as wearing linen or animal-skin garments and “furrowing their cheeks with knives to prevent the growth of beards” (which could simply mean they were bad at shaving).When they acquired textile garments, they wore them unwashed until they rotted and fell off. Their mounts were not small ponies but big, tractable, tough, but ugly horses with heavy heads and flat rumps. Only a few nobles had armour and lances. Others sometimes accompanied bows and bone- tipped arrows with javelins or a lasso. The western Huns were most dangerous when united, the most famous example being the army of Attila until his death in 453 enabled his subject peoples to rebel. The Sabir Huns provided both Byzantines and Sassanids with mercenary infantry that were “exceedingly ferocious and rapacious” and good at siege work. How they were equipped is obscure, since they are described both as “hoplitai” and shooting rapidly on foot and there is also a mention of a Hun leaning on a long shield. Chionites included a proportion of unarmoured riders with lance as well as bow and otherwise looked much like Parthian horse archers. References: Armies and Enemies of Imperial Rome P. Barker, The World of the Huns O.]. Maenchen-Helfen, The Death of Attila C.Holland (novel), The Year of the Horsetails R.F. Tapsell (novel).
— Attila’s army 433 AD - 453 AD
II/65 — TERVINGI & EARLY VISIGOTHIC 200 AD - 419 AD
II/67 — GREUTHINGI, EARLY OSTROGOTHIC, HERUL, SCIRI & TAIFALI 200 AD - 493 AD
II/69 — SASSANID PERSIAN 220 AD - 651 AD
II/70 — BURGUNDI & LIMIGANTES 250 AD - 539 AD
II/72 — EARLY FRANKISH, ALAMANNIC, SUEVI, QUADI, RUGIAN & TURCILINGI 250 AD - 496 AD , 506 AD , 406 AD , 584 AD , 487 AD & 493 AD
II/82 — PATRICIAN ROMAN 408 AD - 493 AD
II/83 — LATER VISIGOTHIC 419 AD - 720 AD
— Sabir Hunnic Army 515 AD - 558 AD
II/28 — EARLY ARMENIAN & GORDYENE 300 BC - 627 AD
II/58 — ALAN 50 AD - 1500 AD
II/69 — SASSANID PERSIAN 220 AD - 651 AD
II/80 — HUNNIC 356 AD - 570 AD
II/83 — LATER VISIGOTHIC 419 AD - 720 AD
— Chionite or Hephthalite Hunnic Army in Bactria or India 356 AD - 570 AD
II/3 — CLASSICAL INDIAN 500 BC - 545 AD
II/46 — KUSHAN 135 BC - 477 AD
III/10 — HINDU INDIAN 545 AD - 1510 AD
— Other Hunnic Armies 374 AD - 558 AD
II/25 — BOSPORAN 310 BC - 107 BC & 10 BC - 375 AD
II/28 — EARLY ARMENIAN & GORDYENE 300 BC - 627 AD
II/38 — HSIUNG-NU OR JUAN-JUAN 250 BC - 555 AD
II/3 — CLASSICAL INDIAN 500 BC - 545 AD
II/46 — KUSHAN 135 BC - 477 AD
II/58 — ALAN 50 AD - 1500 AD
II/65 — TERVINGI & EARLY VISIGOTHIC 200 AD - 419 AD
II/67 — GREUTHINGI, EARLY OSTROGOTHIC, HERUL, SCIRI & TAIFALI 200 AD - 493 AD
II/69 — SASSANID PERSIAN 220 AD - 651 AD
II/71 — GEPID 250 AD - 566 AD
II/72 — EARLY FRANKISH, ALAMANNIC, SUEVI, QUADI, RUGIAN & TURCILINGI 250 AD - 496 AD , 506 AD , 406 AD , 584 AD , 487 AD & 493 AD
II/78 — LATE IMPERIAL ROMAN 307 AD - 408 AD
II/80 — HUNNIC 356 AD - 570 AD
II/83 — LATER VISIGOTHIC 419 AD - 720 AD
III/11 — CENTRAL ASIAN TURKISH 550 AD - 1330 AD
III/8 — CENTRAL-ASIAN CITY STATES 500 AD - 1000 AD